So do tanks, and the original M1 Abrams had a similar cannon. It has a 105mm main gun intended for direct-fire engagements. So let’s evaluate the Booker according to the Potter Tank Test: Do we know it to be a tank when we see it? He may or may not have been describing his method of determining whether a video was “hardcore pornography” and thus in violation of Ohio’s obscenity law, but it’s a convenient way to make up an official-sounding intellectual framework that just happens to support our (correct and esteemed) opinion. “I know it when I see it,” Potter famously argued. In order to determine once and forever more whether the Booker is a tank, we at the Military Times Observation Post developed a legal test* based on Supreme Court Associate Justice Potter Stewart’s 1964 concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. In 2017, the Booker’s former program manager, David Dopp, said “I don’t want to say it’s a light tank, but it’s kind of like a light tank.”Įven Army Secretary Christine Wormuth acknowledged that “some call it a light tank” during the June 13 press conference. 2021 remarks at the Association of the U.S. “To me, it’s a light tank,” McConville said, reaffirming his Oct. James McConville, sounded his opinion on the Booker during a June 13 press conference. This is not a reconnaissance vehicle,” Dean said. “In the Army, the historical use of light tanks has been to perform reconnaissance functions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |